ISO 24617-6:2016 pdf free

ISO 24617-6:2016 pdf free.Language resource management一Semantic annotation framework
With regard to the issue of mutual consistency between SemAF parts, it may be noted that ISO 24617-1 for annotating time and events and ISO 24617-2 for annotating dialogue acts are concerned with sufficiently distinct kinds of semantic information to allow their definitions to be established independently. Other SemAF parts, such as those concerned with semantic roles, with relations in discourse and with spatial information show a certain amount of overlap in the information that they aim to capture, and the question therefore arises: can we ensure that the annotation schemes, defined in these parts, are mutually consistent?
Mutual consistency of SemAF parts relates to the possible integration of annotation schemes defined in different parts. For example, it would be desirable to use the ISO 24617-1 scheme (“ISO-TimeML”) for annotating time and events in combination with the ISO 24617-4 scheme for semantic roles, thereby annotating coherently not only the events identified in the data with their temporal properties, but also the way in which these events are related to their participants. Integrating these annotations with those of spatial information, using the ISO 24617-7 scheme for spatial information, would be another plausible and desirable step, given that time and space are intertwined with concepts relating to motion and velocity. More generally, the integration of SemAF parts would greatly enhance the significance of the individual parts; in the end, SemAF’s crystal growth’ strategy of SemAF is only really useful if the annotation schemes defined in the various parts can grow into a single scheme with a wide coverage of semantic phenomena. Only then can it effectively support such applications as text-based question answering or extracting semantic information from text, and form the basis for automatically recognizing semantic phenomena by means of machine-learning techniques. Clearly, this is only possible if the annotation schemes are mutually consistent (e.g. they use the same classification of event types), and are coherent whether, for example, temporal and spatial objects are viewed as event participants or as the circumstances of an event.ISO 24617-6 pdf download.